From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pagano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 17, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant contends that he should be resentenced because the court did not expressly make a determination on the record regarding his eligibility for youthful offender treatment before imposing sentences (see, CPL 720.20). However, since the defendant made no assertion at the time of the sentencing that he was entitled to be adjudicated a youthful offender, his right thereto was waived (see, People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905). Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis for concluding that the sentences should be set aside.

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pagano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Pagano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER PAGANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 17, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

People v. Watts

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in failing to make a determination on the record as to…

People v. Hall

Thus, this claim is waived. See, People v. McGowen, 42 NY2d 905 (1977); People v. Cox, 4 AD3d 481 (2d Dep't…