Opinion
July 31, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Since there was no objection by defense counsel to the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury, the issue is unpreserved for review (CPL 470.05; see, People v Rodriguez, 144 A.D.2d 598; People v Decambre, 143 A.D.2d 927; People v Williams, 138 A.D.2d 430), and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt. We further find that this sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.