From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pagan

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 6, 2019
169 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2016–08452 Ind. No. 7172/14

02-06-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. David PAGAN, Appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Anjali Biala of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Caroline R. Donhauser of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Anjali Biala of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Caroline R. Donhauser of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. The Supreme Court's limited colloquy did not ensure that the defendant understood the nature of the right to appeal or the distinction between the right to appeal and the other trial rights which are forfeited incident to a plea of guilty (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 137–138, 141, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). Moreover, although the defendant executed a written appeal waiver form, the transcript of the plea proceeding demonstrates that the court did not ascertain on the record whether the defendant had read the waiver or discussed it with defense counsel, or whether he was even aware of its contents (see People v. Santeramo, 153 A.D.3d 1286, 1287, 61 N.Y.S.3d 295 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d at 145, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). Under the circumstances here, the defendant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to appeal (see People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ).

Nevertheless, contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pagan

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 6, 2019
169 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Pagan

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. David Pagan, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 905
91 N.Y.S.3d 727