From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pagan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-28-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Freddie PAGAN, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan Dennehy of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan Dennehy of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed January 16, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. DeSimone, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108 ; People v. McBride, 106 A.D.3d 1110, 1110, 965 N.Y.S.2d 729 ). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pagan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Pagan

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Freddie PAGAN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
142 A.D.3d 1186
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6234