From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pacyon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 12, 1989

Appeal from the Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for severance because the crimes alleged in the indictment were properly joined (see, CPL 200.20 [c]; People v Jenkins, 50 N.Y.2d 981) and defendant did not make a convincing showing that he had a genuine need to refrain from testifying on some of the charges or that the risk of prejudice from a joint trial was substantial (see, CPL 200.20 [a], [b]; People v Lane, 56 N.Y.2d 1; People v Mercer, 151 A.D.2d 1004; People v Casiano, 138 A.D.2d 892, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 857; People v Hoke, 96 A.D.2d 677). We have considered defendant's remaining claims and find that they are either unpreserved or lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Pacyon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Pacyon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS PACYON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)