Opinion
December 13, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.).
Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Further, the defendant's challenges to the adequacy of her plea of guilty, e.g., her contention that the court failed to question her about the medication she was taking at the time she pleaded guilty, and her challenge to her admission, are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, we are satisfied from the record that the defendant's plea of guilty and admission were voluntary and intelligent (see generally, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.