Opinion
December 22, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The trial court's denial of the defendant's request to charge criminal trespass in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of burglary in the second degree was proper since there was no reasonable view of the evidence that the defendant committed the lesser offenses but not the greater ( see, People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 64). The defendant's contention that he had a license or privilege to enter one of the burglarized premises did not justify submitting the lesser-included offense to the jury with respect to that charge ( see, People v. Figueroa, 154 A.D.2d 389, 390; People v. Harrell, 133 A.D.2d 706, 707).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.