From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ostuni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 1990
165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 17, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments and order are affirmed.

The defendant's contentions of ineffective assistance of counsel are wholly without merit in light of the fact that she acknowledged at the plea allocution that she would receive a sentence of 5 to 10 years to which she freely consented after stating that she was not relying on any other representations made to her. The denial of her CPL 440.10 motion, wherein she asserted that her former counsel had promised her that she would receive a lesser sentence, was entirely proper.

We perceive no basis upon which to reduce the sentence imposed (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ostuni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 1990
165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Ostuni

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELISA OSTUNI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Nunez

The record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right…