From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Osmond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 25, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant failed to meet his burden of showing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the "gypsy cab" of which he was an occupant at the time of his arrest, and therefore lacks standing to challenge the subsequent search of that vehicle ( People v Cacioppo, 104 A.D.2d 559). Defendant's argument is, in any event, without merit ( see, People v. Belton, 55 N.Y.2d 49). We further find that the misconduct of the prosecutrix was, in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, harmless, and that the trial court did not, as defendant contends, unduly interject itself into the proceedings. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Osmond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Osmond

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WINWARD OSMOND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Millan

It is my view that a regulated vehicle on a city street, under the spare facts presented to the suppression…

People v. King

Here, the defendant did not assert standing in his omnibus motion and has not attempted to demonstrate a…