From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-20

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, respondent, v. Yokohiro Vidal ORTIZ, also known as Ortiz, defendant-appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered September 8, 2009. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.John E. Tyo, Shortsville, for defendant–appellant. R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, Canandaigua (Heather A. Parker of Counsel), for respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered September 8, 2009. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.John E. Tyo, Shortsville, for defendant–appellant. R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, Canandaigua (Heather A. Parker of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[6] ) and criminal mischief in the third degree (§ 145.05 [2] ) and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment. Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court properly determined that the People met their burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated the terms and conditions of his probation ( see People v. Pringle, 72 A.D.3d 1629, 1629, 900 N.Y.S.2d 215, lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 855, 909 N.Y.S.2d 32, 935 N.E.2d 824; People v. Donohue, 64 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 883 N.Y.S.2d 672; People v. Bergman, 56 A.D.3d 1225, 866 N.Y.S.2d 918, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 756, 876 N.Y.S.2d 707, 904 N.E.2d 844). The People provided the necessary “residuum of competent legal evidence” ( Pringle, 72 A.D.3d at 1630, 900 N.Y.S.2d 215 [internal quotation marks omitted] ), and “the decision to revoke his probation will not be disturbed, [absent a] clear abuse of discretion” ( Bergman, 56 A.D.3d 1225, 866 N.Y.S.2d 918 [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, respondent, v. Yokohiro Vidal ORTIZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 1436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3002
942 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

MEMORANDUM:Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his…

People v. Robinson

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his…