From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 26, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


As defendant failed to raise any argument before the hearing court alleging impropriety in the search of closed containers recovered from defendant's person incident to his arrest, he has failed to preserve the issue and to provide an adequate record for appellate review on the merits (People v. Martin, 50 N.Y.2d 1029, 1031).

In any event, the hearing minutes indicate that defendant was arrested based upon probable cause provided by the observation officer's radioed report to the arresting officer of an observed sale of drugs by defendant, who had secreted his drug supply on his person (People v. Petralia, 62 N.Y.2d 47, 52, cert denied 469 U.S. 852). In these circumstances, the police were justified in conducting a warrantless search of packages recovered from defendant's person, incident to arrest, for the purposes of "the protection of evidence from destruction or concealment" (People v. Gokey, 60 N.Y.2d 309, 312 [emphasis added]).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LENNY ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 6

Citing Cases

People v. Fung

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.). Defendant's general allegations in his…

People v. Allen

Where the police had information that a defendant arrested for sale of a controlled substance had secreted…