From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 03-02312.

March 18, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Mark H. Fandrich, J.), rendered September 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate.

Before: Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law former § 240.32), defendant contends that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial ( see CPL 30.20; see generally People v. Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 444-445). The preindictment delay of 10 months is not unreasonable, and defendant's conclusory allegations of prejudice are otherwise insufficient to support that contention ( see People v. Beyah, 302 AD2d 981, lv denied 99 NY2d 626). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDDIE ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 751

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. Connolly

People v. Ortiz, 758 N.Y.S.2d 566 (N.Y.App. Div), lv. denied, 795 N.E.2d 48 (N.Y. 2003) ( Ortiz I).People v.…

People v. Johnson

We thus conclude that “ ‘the delay caused no further curtailment of [defendant's] freedom’ ” (People v.…