From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1455

June 19, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret Clancy, J.), rendered September 7, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Melissa R. DiPalo, for respondent.

Karen Leslie-Mavridis, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams, Marlow, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning identification. We conclude that the victim had a sufficient opportunity to observe defendant at the time of the crime and was able to make a reliable identification.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment (see People v. Drayton, 39 N.Y.2d 580, 584).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER ORTIZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 324