From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1999
258 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 2, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander Hunter, J.).


It was not error for the trial court to have refused defendant's request for, a missing witness charge as to certain police officers. Defendant has not established that he ever made a prima facie showing of entitlement to such a charge in that he failed to demonstrate that such testimony would not be cumulative.

The court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion in which the court properly balanced the probative value of the convictions with the potential for undue prejudice ( see, People v. Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455, 459).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1999
258 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN ORTIZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 256 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
684 N.Y.S.2d 772