Opinion
October 26, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.
The record indicates that, as a part of the plea agreement, the defendant made a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal the conviction and sentence (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Moreover, were we to have reached the merits, we would have held, contrary to the defendant's argument, that the imposition of consecutive sentences under the circumstances of this case was not illegal (see, People v Day, 73 N.Y.2d 208; People v McGee, 49 N.Y.2d 48; People v Russell, 161 A.D.2d 293). Mangano, P.J., Harwood, Balletta, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.