From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 10, 1990
163 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 10, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory regulations. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 10, 1990
163 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HERMAN ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

City of New York v. VJHC Development Corp.

Thomas contends that Vera was not authorized to accept service on his behalf. However, authority is not a…

Wang v. Li

Contrary to defendants' contention, plaintiff established a presumption of service because the affirmations…