From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 2002
292 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

607

March 28, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J. at hearing; Edward McLaughlin, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered May 13, 1999, convicting defendant of attempted murder in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

David M. Cohn for respondent.

Allen Fallek pro se for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


The record supports the court's finding that there had been an independent source for the police officers' identification of defendant. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). Viewing the hearing evidence as a whole and weighing all relevant factors, most notably the officers' ample opportunity to observe defendant during the commission of the crime, we conclude that the People established independent source by clear and convincing evidence (see, People v. Williams, 222 A.D.2d 149, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 1072). We also find that defendant received meaningful representation at the hearing (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714). There is no basis upon which to conclude that the result of the hearing would have been different if counsel had pursued the lines of inquiry and argument that defendant now claims counsel should have pursued.

When two defense witnesses repeatedly attested to defendant's good character, one of them adding that this good character was known to "the whole neighborhood," this opened the door to questioning regarding defendant's previous conviction for possession of a weapon (see, People v. Rojas, 97 N.Y.2d 32, 38). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 2002
292 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ENRIQUE ORTIZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 195

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

In People v. Williams, 85 NY2d 868, 869 (1995), the Court of Appeals, in holding that there was an…

People v. Kenley

Indeed, the hearing testimony establishes that Morales had a meaningful opportunity to observe the defendant.…