From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-29-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antonio ORTIZ, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.

Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (James A. Hobbs of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Leah R. Mervine of Counsel), for Respondent.


Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (James A. Hobbs of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Leah R. Mervine of Counsel), for Respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree ( Penal Law § 125.25[1] ), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to charge the jury on the defense of mistake of fact (see § 15.20[1][a] ). Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v. Streeter, 21 A.D.3d 1291, 1291–1292, 804 N.Y.S.2d 164, lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 898, 817 N.Y.S.2d 633, 850 N.E.2d 680 ), and we decline to exercise our power to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, and WINSLOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antonio ORTIZ, Jr.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 29, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
60 N.Y.S.3d 891

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. Royce

Petitioner filed a direct appeal with the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. He argued that (1) the trial…