From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Orochena

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Apr 20, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50556 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 2015–1942 W CR.

04-20-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Xavier OROCHENA, Appellant.

McCullough, Goldberger & Staudt, LLP (Kevin E. Staudt, Esq.), for respondent.


McCullough, Goldberger & Staudt, LLP (Kevin E. Staudt, Esq.), for respondent.

Present: BRUCE E. TOLBERT, J.P., JERRY GARGUILO, JAMES V. BRANDS, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Village of Mamaroneck, Westchester County (Daniel Gallagher, J.), rendered July 21, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of overtaking and passing a stopped school bus.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of overtaking and passing a stopped school bus ( Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1174[a] ). On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

At trial, defendant testified that he had passed the stopped school bus only because a police officer had signaled him to pass the bus. The officer, however, denied waving defendant to pass the bus, and stated that he did not signal defendant to pull over and stop until defendant had already passed the bus. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and indulging in all reasonable inferences in the People's favor (see People v. Ford, 66 N.Y.2d 428, 437 [1985] ; People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621 [1983] ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt, beyond a reasonable doubt, of overtaking and passing a stopped school bus ( Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1174[a] ). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15[5] ; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ), while according great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, observe their demeanor, and assess their credibility (see People v. Lane, 7 N.Y.3d 888, 890 [2006] ; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495 [1987] ), we find that the verdict convicting defendant of overtaking and passing a stopped school bus was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 643–646 [2006] ).

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

TOLBERT, J.P., GARGUILO and BRANDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Orochena

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Apr 20, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50556 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

People v. Orochena

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Xavier OROCHENA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.

Date published: Apr 20, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50556 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
58 N.Y.S.3d 875