From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Rama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 13, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. O'Rama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. O'Rama

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN O'RAMA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 13, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 560