From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 1990
168 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 21, 1990

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The issues raised by defendant on appeal lack merit. The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490); the court properly exercised its discretion in making its Sandoval ruling (see, People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371); defendant has not shown that the prosecutor failed to comply with his Rosario obligation (see, People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, rearg denied 9 N.Y.2d 908, cert. denied 368 U.S. 866, rearg denied 14 N.Y.2d 876, 15 N.Y.2d 765); and the alleged error with respect to the jury charge was not preserved for our review and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice.


Summaries of

People v. O'Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 1990
168 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. O'Neal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN A. O'NEAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
565 N.Y.S.2d 339