From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Olstin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1991
171 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 25, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury a circumstantial evidence charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Dawson, 115 A.D.2d 612), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375).

The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, P.J., Brown, Sullivan and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Olstin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1991
171 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Olstin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GILBERTO OLSTIN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 815