From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Olsen

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Mar 12, 2008
No. H031692 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM KARL OLSEN, Defendant and Appellant. H031692 California Court of Appeal, Sixth District March 12, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 210555

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 3, 2008, be modified in the following particulars:

1. On page, 11, the third full paragraph, the acronym “SPVA” is changed to “SVPA” so the sentence reads:

Further, Olsen asserts that the amended SVPA, if construed to require retroactive application of an indeterminate term, would violate the separation of powers doctrine and the right to due process (including the right to notice), as well as the equal protection, ex post facto, and double jeopardy clauses.

2. On page 26, the last line in the second paragraph, beginning “statement of intent” the acronym “SPVA” is changed to “SVPA” so the citation reads: (People v. Carmony (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 317, 324 [quoting the uncodified statement of intent of the SVPA].)

There is no change in the judgment.

Bamattre-Manoukian, ACTING P.J., Mcadams, J., duffy, J.


Summaries of

People v. Olsen

California Court of Appeals, Sixth District
Mar 12, 2008
No. H031692 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Olsen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM KARL OLSEN, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Sixth District

Date published: Mar 12, 2008

Citations

No. H031692 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2008)