From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Oliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1992
182 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 13, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

At sentencing, the defendant sought to withdraw his guilty pleas on the basis that the court intended to enter an order of protection in favor of the robbery victim, although the entry of such an order had not been a part of the plea agreement. The sentencing court properly denied the defendant's request to withdraw his guilty pleas since an order of protection may be issued independently of the plea agreement (see, CPL 530.13).

Moreover, the sentencing court did not err in directing the defendant to make restitution in the amount of $258 without first conducting a hearing (see, Penal Law § 60.27; cf., People v White, 119 A.D.2d 708; People v Clougher, 95 A.D.2d 860), inasmuch as the defendant had consented to pay the restitution as a part of the plea agreement, and the record was otherwise adequate to support the amount directed to be paid (see, People v Corby, 167 A.D.2d 682; People v Palella, 148 A.D.2d 838; People v Raffiani, 83 A.D.2d 650; see also, People v Hall, 173 A.D.2d 729; People v King, 158 A.D.2d 972). Thompson, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Oliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1992
182 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Oliver

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HENRY OLIVER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 265

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

In any event, that contention is without merit. An order of protection may properly be issued independent of…

People v. Roman

We also reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in imposing an order of protection because the…