Opinion
2010-1044 P CR.
08-01-2011
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent O'Hanlon, Appellant.
PRESENT: : , P.J., TANENBAUM and LaCAVA, JJ
Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Putnam Valley, Putnam County (Gina C. Capone, J.), rendered December 15, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of building without a permit.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a nonjury trial, of building without a permit (Code of the Town of Putnam Valley § 165-80). Defendant's contention that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt defendant's guilt of building without a permit. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, observe their demeanor and assess their credibility (see People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 890 [2006]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon a review of the record, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
Defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or are unpreserved for appellate review.
Nicolai, P.J., Tanenbaum and LaCava, JJ., concur.