Opinion
October 30, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions regarding the prosecutor's summation are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Hernandez, 127 A.D.2d 790; People v Reding, 167 A.D.2d 716). In any event, any error was harmless (see, People v. Hernandez, supra; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).
The defendant's remaining contentions regarding the court's charge to the jury, and the alleged admission of hearsay testimony, are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245; People v Bonaparte, 78 N.Y.2d 26; People v. Autry, 75 N.Y.2d 836; People v Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947; People v. Williams, 70 N.Y.2d 946) and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.