Opinion
December 16, 2005.
Crimes — Verdict — Ministerial communication with jury foreperson did not require defendant's presence where clarification about announcing verdict was unrelated to legal or factual issues at trial.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
People v. Ochoa
Supreme Court of the State of New York. BRONX COUNTY
Dec 16, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 1060 (N.Y. Misc. 2005)
Summaries of
People v. Ochoa
Supreme Court of the State of New York. BRONX COUNTY
Dec 16, 2005
10 Misc. 3d 1060 (N.Y. Misc. 2005)
Case details for
People v. Ochoa
Case Details
Full title:PEOPLE v. OCHOA (MARK)
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. BRONX COUNTY
Date published: Dec 16, 2005
Citations
10 Misc. 3d 1060 (N.Y. Misc. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 52055
Citing Cases
People v. McDay
Indeed, the defendant has not provided this Court with any affidavits from the witnesses who allegedly saw…
Ochoa v. BreslinDecl.”); Respondent's Memorandum of Law, dated October 6, 2010 (“Resp. Mem.”); People v. Ochoa, 10 Misc.3d…