Opinion
KA 02-00717.
Decided March 19, 2004.
Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered February 11, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny.
CHRISTINE M. COOK, LYONS, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (THOMAS D. REH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND HAYES, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is granted, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on the superior court information.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon her Alford plea ( see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25), of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and petit larceny (§ 155.25). The sole contention on appeal is that County Court erred in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw her guilty plea. Although defendant failed to preserve for our review her contention that the court should not have accepted her Alford plea without insisting on a stronger factual recitation by the prosecution ( see People v. Spulka, 285 A.D.2d 840, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 643), we address the contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15[a]). "In New York, such a plea is allowed only when, as in Alford itself, it is the product of a voluntary and rational choice, and the record before the court contains strong evidence of actual guilt" ( Matter of Silmon v. Travis, 95 N.Y.2d 470, 475; see People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 486 n 3). Here, the record establishes that the court ascertained that defendant was making a knowing and voluntary choice to waive indictment and plead guilty to the crimes charged in the superior court information (SCI). The record does not, however, contain the requisite evidence of defendant's guilt of burglary or larceny, and thus we conclude that the court erred in accepting the plea ( see Alford, 400 US at 37; Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d at 486 n 3). We therefore reverse the judgment, grant defendant's motion, vacate the plea, and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the SCI.