Opinion
February 1, 1991
Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.
Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues that the court lacked jurisdiction over the charge of forgery in the second degree because defendant had not been held for the action of a Grand Jury on that charge when he pled guilty to a Superior Court Information. He argues that his plea should be vacated. We disagree. The court's dismissal of that charge and authorization to re-present it to a Grand Jury is deemed to constitute an order holding defendant for the action of the Grand Jury (CPL 210.45). We have examined defendant's remaining arguments on appeal and find them lacking in merit.