From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nieves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 6, 2003
302 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

12388

February 6, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (La Buda, J.), rendered January 24, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of manslaughter in the second degree and driving while intoxicated.

Craig S. Leeds, Albany, for appellant.

Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney, Monticello (Bonnie M. Mitzner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Defendant entered a counseled plea of guilty to the crimes of manslaughter in the second degree and driving while intoxicated in full satisfaction of an 11-count indictment. He was then sentenced to the agreed upon prison term of 3 to 9 years on the charge of manslaughter in the second degree and a concurrent term of one year on the charge of driving while intoxicated. On this appeal, defendant contends that County Court erred by accepting his guilty plea because it was factually insufficient and was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently made. As defendant failed to move either to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, this issue has not been preserved for our review (see People v. Johnson, 297 A.D.2d 879, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 537; People v. McWhite, 295 A.D.2d 757). Were we to consider the merits of this contention, however, we would be unpersuaded. Our review of the transcript of the plea hearing discloses that defendant's guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made and that his admissions of driving with a blood alcohol level of .15%, losing control of his motor vehicle and fatally striking a pedestrian established the factual elements of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty (see People v. Kemp, 288 A.D.2d 635, 636).

Nor do we find merit in defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. "In the context of a guilty plea, a defendant has been afforded meaningful representation when he or she receives an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel" (People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404 [citations omitted]). Upon the facts before us, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation from defense counsel who, inter alia, negotiated a favorable plea bargain given the severity of defendant's crimes and the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.

We are equally unpersuaded by defendant's assertion that the sentence is harsh or excessive. The record contains no indication that County Court abused its discretion by imposing the sentence nor are there any extraordinary circumstances warranting modification thereof in the interest of justice (see People v. Bankowski, 204 A.D.2d 802, 803).

CARDONA, P.J., PETERS, SPAIN and KANE, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Nieves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 6, 2003
302 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Nieves

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERTO NIEVES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 762

Citing Cases

People v. Zimmerman

acknowledged each of these rights and freely admitted her guilt ( see People v. Board, 75 A.D.3d at 834, 906…

People v. Zimmerman

The terms of the plea agreement were clearly set forth and County Court fully advised defendant of the rights…