From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nicovic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 9, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments and the amended judgment are affirmed.

A review of the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilty (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11). The defendant's assertion that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to counsel's alleged failure to inform him that he was pleading guilty to a felony necessarily rests upon matters dehors the record and is not cognizable on the appeal before us. In any event, a review of the record demonstrates that the defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nicovic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Nicovic

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT NICOVIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 9, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 168

Citing Cases

State v. Bolden

Therefore, the sentence actually imposed by the court never included, and does not now include, any period of…

People v. Montano

We decline to reduce the defendant's sentence in the interest of justice (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d…