From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nicholas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-07293.

Decided June 1, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered August 2, 2002, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Cristin N. Connell of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DANIEL F. LUCIANO, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his waiver of his right to appeal was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent ( see People v. Moisett, 76 N.Y.2d 909,911; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 280). Although the defendant's claims of an involuntary plea and illegal sentence survive the waiver ( see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1,9; People v. Brathwaite, 263 A.D.2d 89), the contention that the plea was involuntary is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v. Alexis, 295 A.D.2d 529). Moreover, to the extent these issues were raised in the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, they are not properly before this court as he failed to seek leave to appeal from the order denying that motion ( see People v. Alexis, supra; People v. Torres, 194 A.D.2d 815) . In any event, upon review of the record, we find no merit to his contentions that the plea was coerced, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender ( see People v. Higgs, 266 A.D.2d 233; People v. Langhorne, 177 A.D.2d 713,714; People v. Leonard, 109 A.D.2d 754).

The fact that defense counsel may have misinformed the defendant of his possible sentence exposure on an unrelated felony complaint is "[a] factor which must be considered by the court, but it is not, in and of itself, dispositive" ( People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869,870). Under the totality of the plea proceedings, the misstatement by counsel had no effect on the defendant's decision to plead guilty ( see People v. Burnett, 221 A.D.2d 355; People v. Provosty, 141 A.D.2d 867, 868).

LUCIANO, J.P., H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nicholas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. SHAWN NICHOLAS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The defendant's valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal, executed as part of his plea agreement,…

People v. Wynn

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contentions that his plea was not knowing, voluntary,…