From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Newsom

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-19

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tosh NEWSOM, appellant.

Karl E. Bonheim, Riverhead, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas Constant of counsel), for respondent.


Karl E. Bonheim, Riverhead, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas Constant of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered February 19, 2010, convicting him attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court conducted a proper inquiry with respect to new charges against the defendant, before imposing an enhancedsentence ( see People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 713, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356). An evidentiary hearing was not required ( see People v. Albergotti, 17 N.Y.3d 748, 750, 929 N.Y.S.2d 18, 952 N.E.2d 1010). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Jones, 294 A.D.2d 450, 741 N.Y.S.2d 740) and, in any event, without merit ( see People v. Vasquez, 267 A.D.2d 118, 701 N.Y.S.2d 8).

DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, CHAMBERS and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Newsom

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tosh NEWSOM, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
966 N.Y.S.2d 865
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4629