From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Newkirk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2017
60 N.Y.S.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-05-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Craig NEWKIRK, Defendant–Appellant.

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Biben, J.), rendered on or about March 1, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ACOSTA, P.J., RENWICK, WEBBER, OING, MOULTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Newkirk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2017
60 N.Y.S.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Newkirk

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Craig NEWKIRK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

Citations

60 N.Y.S.3d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)