From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Newkirk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1504 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-16

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Deqwaun L. NEWKIRK, Defendant–Appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.



The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Barbara J. Davies of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3] ), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he possessed the loaded firearm found by the police in the basement of a suspected drug house in which he was located when the police executeda search warrant ( see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). We reject that contention. The evidence at trial established that defendant was the only person in the house when the police entered, and an officer testified that, immediately before the police gained entry, he heard the sounds of someone inside running down and then up the basement stairs. When questioned by the police, defendant admitted that he had purchased the firearm in question, a photograph of which was on the screen saver of defendant's cell phone, and it was later determined that defendant's DNA was on the firearm. That evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant possessed the firearm ( see § 10.00[8]; People v. Manini, 79 N.Y.2d 561, 573–574, 584 N.Y.S.2d 282, 594 N.E.2d 563;People v. Sierra, 45 N.Y.2d 56, 59–60, 407 N.Y.S.2d 669, 379 N.E.2d 196).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Newkirk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 16, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1504 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Newkirk

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Deqwaun L. NEWKIRK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1504 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
100 A.D.3d 1504
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7792

Citing Cases

People v. White

Dominion and control can be established where the defendant is the only person present, furtive movements are…

People v. White

In order to rely upon a theory of constructive possession the People must show that the defendant exercised…