Summary
In People v Nenni (261 AD2d 900 [4th Dept 1999]), the judge who heard the defendant's omnibus motion granted his request for a suppression hearing, but the successor judge later denied suppression without a hearing.
Summary of this case from People v. HamptonOpinion
May 7, 1999
Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.
Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Orleans County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in denying defendant's suppression motion without conducting a hearing. Defendant's omnibus motion, which was argued before a different Judge, contained sworn statements that the evidence seized should be suppressed because the police lacked probable cause to stop the vehicle in which he was a passenger. The People denied defendant's allegations and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with a hearing ( see, CPL 710.60, [4]; People v. Youngblood, 210 A.D.2d 948). The Judge before whom the motion was argued orally granted defendant's request for a hearing
Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Hannigan, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.
and thus his decision constitutes the law of the case ( see, People v. Broome, 151 A.D.2d 995; People v. Johnson, 131 A.D.2d 696, 697, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 713). In any event, the successor Judge, who was not present for oral argument, was precluded from deciding the motion ( see, Judiciary Law § 21; People v. Cameron, 194 A.D.2d 438; People v. Hooper, 22 A.D.2d 1006). Furthermore, the court erred in relying on the Grand Jury minutes in determining that a hearing was not necessary ( see, People v. Letts, 156 A.D.2d 868, 869). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Orleans County Court for a suppression hearing.