From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nelson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2017
155 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-14-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Latik NELSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David Bernstein of Counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of Counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David Bernstein of Counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of Counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered May 31, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., KAPNICK, WEBBER, GESMER, OING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nelson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2017
155 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Latik NELSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
63 N.Y.S.3d 670