From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John P. Collins, J.).


Overwhelming evidence at trial demonstrated that defendant, his codefendant brother, and a third person, simultaneously shot at Felix Almanzar and Leonard Irizarry, causing the death of the latter.

The trial court properly admitted the statement of the non-testifying codefendant to a police investigator that when he heard that his brother had been killed by Almanzar he stated, "I did what I had to do." Defendant's right of confrontation was not violated by the admission of this statement, since it clearly was not facially incriminating to defendant, and the court gave explicit instructions to the jury that the statement related only to the codefendant and was not to be considered in any way as evidence in the case of defendant, and that separate verdicts were to be entered for each of the defendants (see, Richardson v Marsh, 481 U.S. 200).

We have considered defendant's additional claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE NEAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Guidice

To the extent that these statements were introduced as declarations against the declarant's penal interest…

People v. Chalk

Defendant's principal argument on appeal is that he was denied his constitutional right to confrontation (US…