Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Monterey County Super. Ct. No. SS010450
Rushing, P.J.
Defendant Daniel Navarro appeals from a judgment entered after he admitted a probation violation and his probation was revoked. The defendant was on probation because in 2001, while driving drunk, defendant evaded the police, rammed his truck into the front of a police cruiser by backing into it at 25 miles per hour, and after fleeing again, was involved in a collision where he was seriously injured. Defendant agreed to plead no contest to assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (c)) and misdemeanor driving under the influence of an alcohol or drug (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (a)) on the condition that he receive felony probation. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the trial court placed defendant on felony probation for five years with a number of conditions, including that he participate in, and complete a residential treatment program.
Thereafter, the probation department filed several petitions to revoke or modify probation. The most recent petition, which is the subject of this appeal, was filed after defendant refused to be transported to a residential treatment facility pursuant to the trial court’s order on a prior probation violation. After denying defendant’s request to reinstate probation and send him to a different treatment program than was previously ordered, the trial court revoked probation and sentenced defendant to serve the middle term of imprisonment of four years. This appeal ensued.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have received no written argument from defendant.
Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.
Disposition
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR: PREMO, J. MIHARA, J.