From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Navarro

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Mar 10, 2009
2d Crim. B207242 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 10, 2009)

Opinion

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Superior Court County of Ventura Honorable Patricia M. Murphy, Judge, Super. Ct. Nos.2007019907, 2007035574

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


COFFEE, J.

Jose Lino Navarro appeals from the judgment following his guilty plea to inflicting injury on a cohabitant in case number 2007019907 and destruction of jail property in case number 2007035574. (Pen. Code, §§ 273.5, subd. (a); 4600, subd. (a).) The court sentenced appellant to consecutive state prison terms of two years for inflicting injury on a cohabitant and eight months for destruction of jail property. (§§ 273.5, subd. (a); 4600, subd. (a).) It also imposed consecutive terms of one year for assault with a deadly weapon by means likely to cause great bodily injury, and eight months for possession of a controlled substance, in two probation revocation cases. (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).)

Appellant and his girlfriend moved to Port Hueneme in May of 2007. On May 26, 2007, he hit and injured her. He also shattered the windshield of her car. The prosecution charged him with inflicting injury on a cohabitant and vandalism in case number 2007019907. On September 4, 2007, while incarcerated at the Todd Road Jail, appellant broke a cell window. The prosecution charged him with destruction of jail property in case number 2007035574.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On, September 19, 2008, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. Appellant did not respond.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: YEGAN, Acting P.J., PERREN, J.


Summaries of

People v. Navarro

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Mar 10, 2009
2d Crim. B207242 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 10, 2009)
Case details for

People v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LINO NAVARRO, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2009

Citations

2d Crim. B207242 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 10, 2009)