From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Natali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.).


At sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty, claiming that his attorney tricked him into it by leading him to believe that the court had made an off-the-record promise to impose a shorter sentence of 3 to 6 years than the one promised on the record. After reviewing the plea allocution and conducting a limited inquiry of the prosecutor and defense counsel, the court denied the motion, finding that there was no factual basis to support the claim and finding that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily made.

There is no merit to defendant's argument that he was deprived of an opportunity to show otherwise by the denial of his motion without a hearing. Given plea minutes that unequivocally refuted any claim of an off-the-record promise, the limited inquiry conducted by the court sufficed to assure an informed and prudent determination (People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Natali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1993
193 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Natali

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EMILIO NATALI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 6, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
597 N.Y.S.2d 315

Citing Cases

People v. Avery

Defendant acknowledged that he understood these terms, and that there were no other promises. Accordingly,…