From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nappo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

In Nappo, the Nappo defendants formed a corporation for the purpose of importing motor fuel oil and conspired to evade payment of state sales taxes.

Summary of this case from People v. Western Express

Opinion

May 17, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting those branches of the respondents' motion which were to dismiss counts two and three of the indictment and substituting therefor a provision denying those branches of the respondents' motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, and counts two and three of the indictment are reinstated.

The respondents were indicted for, inter alia, enterprise corruption, conspiracy in the fourth degree, and grand larceny in the first degree in connection with their alleged involvement in a scheme to import motor fuel from New Jersey to New York without filing reports or paying taxes as required by the New York Tax Law.

The Grand Jury evidence is insufficient to establish that the respondents engaged in any structure, business, activity, or continuity of criminal purpose beyond the scope of the criminal incidents alleged in the indictment. Thus, the respondents were not engaged in a criminal enterprise as defined by the enterprise corruption statute ( see, Penal Law § 460.10). In addition, the Grand Jury evidence was insufficient to establish that the respondents had engaged in a pattern of criminal activity as defined by the enterprise corruption statute ( see, Penal Law § 460.10; § 460.20 [2]). Accordingly, the County Court properly dismissed count one of the indictment.

The Grand Jury evidence is sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the respondents withheld property from its rightful owner, i.e., the State of New York, as defined by the Penal Law ( see, Penal Law § 155.05, 155.42 Penal). Accordingly, counts two and three of the indictment should not have been dismissed.

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nappo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

In Nappo, the Nappo defendants formed a corporation for the purpose of importing motor fuel oil and conspired to evade payment of state sales taxes.

Summary of this case from People v. Western Express

In People v. Nappo (261 A.D.2d 558, 559, revd on other grounds 94 N.Y.2d 564), relied upon by the appellant, this court upheld the dismissal of the count of the indictment charging the defendants therein with enterprise corruption on the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury failed to establish that the defendants were engaged in "any structure, business, activity or continuity of criminal purpose beyond the scope of the criminal incidents alleged in the indictment".

Summary of this case from People v. Conigliaro
Case details for

People v. Nappo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant v. WILLIAM S. NAPPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 649

Citing Cases

People v. Western Express

Examination of cases in which charges of enterprise corruption were upheld, and others in which they were…

People v. Keschner

The cited authority does not support the inverse proposition that interchangeability of personnel is…