From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Napoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502754.

April 17, 2008.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Garry, J.), entered June 4, 2007, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Leighton Spaulding, Malone, appellant pro se.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, New York City, and Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (David M. Finkelstein of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., JJ.


Petitioner is currently serving a prison sentence of 25 years to life upon his 1994 conviction of murder in the second degree. The conviction was affirmed upon appeal ( People v Spaulding, 222 AD2d 312, lv denied 88 NY2d 942) and, since then, petitioner has made various unsuccessful postconviction applications, including motions pursuant to CPL article 440 and habeas corpus proceedings. Petitioner commenced the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus alleging, among other things, that his detention is illegal because the indictment was jurisdictionally defective in that it improperly characterized murder in the second degree as an armed felony, and because the correctional facility at which he is detained does not have a copy of his certificate of conviction on file, in violation of CPL 380.60. Supreme Court denied the application, as well as petitioner's subsequent motion for reconsideration, which the court treated as a motion to reargue. Petitioner now appeals.

The issues presented by petitioner could have been raised on direct appeal or in a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 and, thus, are not proper subjects of a habeas corpus proceeding ( see People ex rel. King v Bennett, 45 AD3d 1015, 1016, lv denied 10 NY3d 703; People ex rel. Alvarez v West, 22 AD3d 996, lv denied 6 NY3d 704). Furthermore, no extraordinary circumstances exist to justify a departure from orderly procedure ( see People ex rel. Figueroa v Walsh, 40 AD3d 1282). Accordingly, we affirm.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

People v. Napoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Napoli

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. LEIGHTON SPAULDING, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3348
857 N.Y.S.2d 257

Citing Cases

People v. Connolly

Supreme Court denied petitioner's application without a hearing, resulting in this appeal. In support of his…

People ex Rel. Spaulding v. R.K. Woods

His conviction was subsequently affirmed on appeal ( People v Spaulding, 222 AD2d 312, lv denied 88 NY2d…