From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Napaletano, Paradiso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927

Present — Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.


Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county, as to defendant Paradiso, modified by striking therefrom the words "and five years to ten years additional pursuant to Section 1944 of the Penal Law," and as so modified affirmed, pursuant to the provisions of section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Defendant was not amenable to the provisions of section 1944 of the Penal Law. ( People v. Kevlon, 221 App. Div. 224.) Young, Rich and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent as to the illegality of the sentence of Paradiso, being of opinion that he was properly sentenced under section 1944 of the Penal Law. Judgment of conviction as to defendant Napaletano unanimously affirmed pursuant to the provisions of section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Added by Laws of 1926, chap. 705, as amd. by Laws of 1927, chap. 342. — [REP.


Summaries of

People v. Napaletano, Paradiso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

People v. Napaletano, Paradiso

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARMINE NAPALETANO and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)