From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Namro Holding Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 30, 1960
171 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1960

Decided November 30, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, VINCENT R. IMPELLITTERI, P.J., JOHN V. FLOOD and EDWARD D. CAIAZZO, JJ., JOSEPH A. SARAFITE, P.J., ARTHUR DUNAIF and MICHAEL POTTER, JJ.

Abraham Engelman and Jacob W. Friedman for appellant.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel ( Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Elias Low of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE and FOSTER; Judges FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: The majority of this court has voted to affirm upon the ground that the propriety of the notice of violation may not be collaterally reviewed in this criminal action, and without reaching the question as to whether there was in fact a violation of the fire exit rules. With this we cannot agree.


Summaries of

People v. Namro Holding Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 30, 1960
171 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

People v. Namro Holding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NAMRO HOLDING CORP.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 30, 1960

Citations

171 N.E.2d 893 (N.Y. 1960)
171 N.E.2d 893
209 N.Y.S.2d 813

Citing Cases

People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.

"That said violation of law was committed by said defendant in the county of Queens." The People, citing…

People v. Xanadu

The department pemitted this work to go forward and then brought on these prosecutions for completion of the…