From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nagle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2003
308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1632

September 23, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J. on motions; Michael Obus, J. at plea and sentence), rendered July 30, 2001, convicting defendant of attempted computer trespass, and sentencing him to a conditional discharge with 5 days of community service and a $500 fine, unanimously affirmed.

Eli R. Koppel, for respondent.

James William Hubert, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's claim that he was entitled to immunity from the use of certain evidence he furnished at the direction of his employer essentially constitutes a claim that his indictment was based on inadmissible evidence. Accordingly, his guilty plea forecloses review of this argument (see People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227).

The motion court properly denied defendant's suppression motion without a hearing (see CPL 710.60; 60.45[2]).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Nagle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2003
308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Nagle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENNIS NAGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 625

Citing Cases

People v. Walker

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.…