From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nadal

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Jun 22, 2015
17 N.Y.S.3d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 2013–2020WCR 2013–2039WCR.

06-22-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wilson NADAL, Appellant.


Opinion

Appeals from two judgments of the City Court of Yonkers, Westchester County (Edward J. Gaffney, J.), rendered August 28, 2013. The judgments convicted defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and criminal trespass in the third degree, respectively. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California (386 U.S. 738 [1967] ), in which he seeks leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the appeals are consolidated for purposes of disposition; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 U.S. 738 ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606 [1979] ).

TOLBERT, J.P., GARGUILO and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nadal

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.
Jun 22, 2015
17 N.Y.S.3d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Nadal

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wilson NADAL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9 and 10 Judicial Dist.

Date published: Jun 22, 2015

Citations

17 N.Y.S.3d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)