From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

00-03450

Submitted May 9, 2002

June 3, 2002

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered March 24, 2000, convicting her of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsi of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Marilyn B. Ampolsk of counsel), for respondent.

SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish her guilt of the crimes of which she was convicted is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Nace

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. TARA NACE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 908