From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Musto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 6, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment as amended is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was entitled to a charge on the defense of justification (see, Penal Law § 35.05) because, at the time he was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, he was driving a passenger to a hospital. However, the charge request was properly denied since there was no reasonable view of the evidence to support it ( see, People v. Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299). The passenger, who appeared to be intoxicated but not in need of medical attention, was not in any imminent danger so as to warrant the "emergency measure" (Penal Law § 35.05) of having another intoxicated person drive him to a hospital ( cf., People v. Maher, 79 N.Y.2d 978).

Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Musto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Musto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS MUSTO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 960

Citing Cases

State v. Fermin

Under Penal Law § 35.05 (2), conduct that would otherwise constitute an offense is justified when it "is…

People v. Rodriguez

The jury was prevented from considering this defense which would have constituted a complete defense to the…