From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1997
244 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 3, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, an inmate at the Westchester County Jail, was charged, inter alia, with five counts of assault against two correction officers following an incident that occurred on January 19, 1995. The testimony elicited at trial revealed that Correction Officer Gerald Farmer, while attempting to put restraints on the defendant, was assaulted by another inmate. After that inmate attacked Officer Farmer, a struggle ensued between the defendant and Officer Farmer. The testimony of Officer Farmer and that of another officer were inconsistent and there is no other evidence that the defendant ever hit Officer Farmer. Having heard an "officer needs assistance" distress call, Correction Officer Dennis Minella arrived at the scene and went to assist in restraining the defendant and the other inmate who had previously attacked Officer Farmer. While attempting to subdue the defendant, Officer Minella injured his knee on the concrete floor.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, and viewing the elements of the crime as charged, the verdict convicting the defendant of assault in the second degree under Penal Law § 120.05 (3) as to Officer Minella and acquitting him of the same charge as it related to Officer Farmer was not repugnant ( see, People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Samuels, 203 A.D.2d 494). In addition, viewing defense counsel's conduct in its entirety, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1997
244 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES O. MURRAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 653

Citing Cases

People v. Lewis

However, in addition to being unpreserved ( see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987), this contention is…